- Bastard Nation - http://bastards.org -

Bastard Nation Analysis and Endorsement of The Adoptee Citizenship Act of 2015

BN logo [1]

Bastard Nation Analysis and Endorsement of

The Adoptee Citizenship Act of 2015

This report will be updated when appropriate.

A shorter bullet point version of this report is here [2]

Until 2000 children adopted internationally by a US citizen were required to undergo a naturalization process prescribed by US law. Depending on the type of visa the child traveled under to enter the US, some were granted automatic citizenship while others gained citizenship only after their adoptive parents “re-adopted” them in the US following procedures outlined by federal and individual state law.

Unfortunately, many adoptive parents did not check citizenship status at the time of adoption or follow through on the citizenship process. Some say they were unaware of naturalization requirements and believed citizenship was automatic upon adoption finalization. Some claim to have been misled by their adoption agencies, courts, lawyers, or federal immigration authorities. Some believed that it was up to the adoptee, at the age of majority, to choose their citizenship status. In some cases adoptive parents disrupted the adoption, and either “rehomed” the children they brought to the US or turned them over to the state foster care system where they lingered with no legal closure.

Decades later these misunderstandings and failures led to legal problems—including deportation proceedings– for international adoptees years after their adoptions were were assumed “finalized” and citizenship granted. Most of these adoptees had no idea that they were not US citizens until they attempted something as simple as registering to vote or were convicted of minor crimes—even misdemeanors—and fell under the gaze of government authorities.

The passage of the federal Child Citizenship Act of 2000 [3] (text [4])  (CCA) attempted to remedy this situation by granting automatic citizenship to those 21 and younger adopted internationally on or after February 27, 2000, the effective date of the legislation.

Those adopted before that date were left behind, subject to federal investigation and possible deportation under the old system. The situation became worse after 9/11 when legal identity and proof of citizenship came under critical scrutiny by federal, state, and local governments. Since then, the number of international adoptees deported or in the deportation pipeline has grown dramatically Most have been convicted of minor non-violent offenses particularly controlled substance possession; others reportedly investigated and threatened with deportation for simply applying for a Pell Grant or Social Security benefits. One absurd case involved German adoptee, Mary Anne Gehris [5], an administrative assistant and mother of two in Covington, Georgia, who in 1998 applied for citizenship so she could vote and accept scholarship money. She admitted on her application that ten years earlier she had been convicted of misdemeanor battery for pulling a woman’s hair during a “spat” over a boyfriend, and had done a year’s probation, and community service time. She avoided deportation when the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole granted her a pardon to keep her in the US. She became a US citizen in 2001.

The federal government keeps no statistics on the number of deported adoptees or how many adoptees are in the US without US citizenship. We are therefore forced to rely on media reports on individual deportation cases. The most complete documentation is located on the website of the adoption watchdog Pound Pup Legacy [6]. Researchers however, say that the number of “illegal adoptees” can go as high as 15,000 [7]. Many probably are not aware of their “illegal” status and some may not even know they are adopted. To make matters worse, those who learn they aren’t citizens are fearful of coming forward to apply for citizenship because under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996 [8]they can be charged as undocumented by INS/ICE and subject to deportation, The law gives judges little discretion to stay deportations.

Currently, America’s “illegal adoptees” cannot gain permanent resident status. They cannot legally hold jobs or driver licenses or register vehicles, open bank accounts, join the military, receive security clearances, apply for US passports, or receive any number of government entitlements or funds—including Social Security which they or their or their spouses have paid in to.

[9]
Rudi Richards/Udo Ackerman. Adoptee deported to Germany; US Army vet

What we do know is that the majority of adoptee deportees are Asian and Latino, most adopted as infants or toddlers by white parents, some military. Some deportees, such as Rudi Richards/Udo Ackerman [10] (Germany) and Monte Haimes/Ho-Kyu-Han [11] (Korea) in fact, are veterans whose status wasn’t flagged when they enlisted in the military. A number of deportees, such as Adam Crapser (Korea) and Jennifer Haynes [12](India) were victims of child physical and sexual abuse, disrupted adoptions, and abusive foster care.

Adoptee deportees have little or no memory of their countries of origin. They have no native-language skills, and no family, friends, or support system in their first countries. Most have no means of employment in their original countries due not only to those limitations but because those governments severed citizenship when the child was adopted to the US. News reports indicate that deported adoptees often end up in homeless shelters and the streets—or worse– when returned to their countries of origin.

Anissa [19]
Anissa Druesedow de Thelwel, born in Jamaica, adopted in Panama by US military family, deported to Jamaica. Teenage cancer survivor Adoptive parents considered her a “walking medical bill” and refused to help her because “she broke the law.”

Anissa Druesedow de Thelwel [20]was born in Jamaica in 1970, When she was 6 her biological mother took her and her sister to Panama to live where she was sexually abused by her mother’s boyfriends and family members. Later when her mother abandoned the siblings to their grandfather, he put them in an orphanage where the abuse continued. In 1982 Anissa and her sister were adopted by an American couple stationed at the military base in Panama City. Six years later, back in the States, she was diagnosed with cancer and her left leg was amputated. When she turned 18 military insurance expired and as a “walking medical bill” her adoptive parents let her know she’d out-stayed her welcome. By 2003, Anissa was a single mother holding down dead-end jobs with an ex-husband who refused to pay child support. She was convicted of Grand Theft (no details) and sentenced to at least one year in prison. During prison processing ICE informed her she had not been naturalized; therefore not a US citizen. Federal authorities put a hold on her keeping her from participating in the work-release program or resuming her old job which her former employer had promised her. Her adoptive parents said she’d broken the law and refused to help. In 2006 Anissa was deported to Jamaica where authorities, although the government had accepted her, did not believe she was Jamaican and didn’t want her. She made her way to Panama where she has re-married and now lives. Anissa volunteers at local orphanages, including the one she lived in as a child, works as a translator, and is active in internet adoption forums and the ACA campaign. She hopes to be allowed to return to the US.

Mark Lyttle [21]
Mark Lyttle, born and adopted in the US, deported to Mexico (later went to Guatemala, Honduras and maybe Nicaragua). Has history of mental illness and gave conflicting stories to police about his background when he was charged with assault. Deported despite documentation, including FBI report, that he was US citizen. Besides, he “looked Mexican.”

At least one documented US citizen has been deported. North Carolina-born and adopted Mark Lyttle [22], (also here [23])  was shipped off to Mexico after serving time for assault. Lyttle has a history of mental illness. He attested alienage (but also made contradictory statements) to ICE which took his word over FBI records that indicated US birth and citizenship. Besides, he “looked Mexican.” (Lyttle’s biological father is part Puerto Rican) ” Lyttle returned to the US after Mexico deported him to Honduras and Honduras sent him to Guatemala (and perhaps Nicaragua) where he was able to connect with the US Counsel who cleared the way for him to return to the US in a matter of hours. Upon arrival, however, ICE attempted to deport him again, but finally OK’d his release after pressure from his lawyer. Lyttle successfully sued ICE, which admitted no wrongdoing and was awarded an unspecified settlement.

Two new deportation cases have recently been publicized.

Susan Hill [24]
Susan Hill/Viviana Isobel Diaz-Henao, deported to Columbia. Adopted in sibling group of 5; all were naturalized but Susan. Parents were “too busy” to finish the process.

######

Since the passage of ACA 2000 attempts have been made to close the pre-2000 “loophole,” but have met with resistance even by members of Congress who “get it.” In general, international adoption has been caught in the crosshairs of current and proposed immigration policy and controversy. A major stumbling block has been a concern over a “pathway to citizenship” for those convicted of crimes and deported to their country of origin

In 2015 US. Sens. Amy Klobuchar, (D-Minnesota), and Jeff Merkley, (D-Oregon) introduced S2275, The Adoptee Citizenship Act of 2015 [32] (ACA) an amendment to the Child Citizenship Act of 2000. Recently Rep. Adam Smith (D-Washington) introduced HB 5454,  the companion bill [33] in the House. The House bill is slightly different in that it clarifies confusing language in the Senate bill covering background check provisions regarding resolution and adjudication of criminal proceedings that led to deportation or in some cases voluntary exit from the US due to “illegal” status.

The bill if passed will retroactively grant citizenship to all adoptees who did not fall under the original bill. To settle concerns over a “pathway to citizenship,” the bill requires that the sentences of those deported be served in full before citizenship is considered.

As before, ACA  has become a hard-sell with adoptee citizenship being conflated with immigration controversies. Reportedly some conservative legislators who actually supported earlier attempts to amend  the original bill are hesitant to step forward for fear of being perceived as ‘pro-immigration.” The ACA they say,  can be the camel’s nose under the tent regarding immigration loopholes even though international adoption is not an immigration issue and is, in fact, deeply promoted by US foreign policy.

Currently S2275 the is in the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Oren Hatch (R-Utah) It has only a handful of Senate sponsors. The House companion HB5454 is in the House Judiciary Committee. No action can be taken on the ACA in either house until enough sponsors are recruited in each chamber,   appropriate Senate and House chairs are convinced to release the bill for hearings and a committee vote and then sent on for floor for passage. Lack of interest, along with upcoming presidential election and the failure of either house to move on stand-alone bills in general, has slowed down the ACA leaving the citizenship and rights of thousands of US cross-country adoptees in limbo.

So far, two Adoptee Citizenship Act Days [34] ( April 19, 2016, and June 14, 2016) have been held in Washington, DC. Sponsored by the National Korean American Service and Education Consortium (NAKASEC), 18 Million Rising, Gazillion Strong, the Adoptee Rights Campaign (ARC) and the Korean American Coalition, activists and allies from across the country have met on Capitol Hill with members of the House and Senate to press for passage. Activities have included press conferences featuring adoptees who do not hold US citizenship, one-on-one lobbying with lawmakers and aides, and a call-in for activists who could not attend the events in person.

ACA Day [35]
April 19th Day of Action: “We were joined by adoptees without citizenship and shared with legislators the stories of the thousands of adoptees impacted by the loophole in the Childhood Citizenship Act.” Courtesy of Adoptee Rights Campaign

 

######

Bastard Nation supports the Adoptee Citizenship Act 2015, the amendment to the  Child  Citizenship Act of 2000. We believe:

Bastard Nation is working to secure sponsorship and support from Senate and House members. In addition to Klobuchar and Merkley, current Senate co-sponsors are Senators Dan Coates (R-Indiana), Kristen Gillibrand (D-New York) Brian Schatz (D-Hawai’i), and Mazie Hironi (D-Hawai’i). House sponsors are Adam Smith (D-Washington) and Trent Franks (R-Arizona). We urge individuals and organizations to contact  [36]their US Representatives and Senators to push for sponsorship and support and groups to endorse it.

ACA 2015 is endorsed by Bastard Nation and a wide range of adoptee rights and adoption advocacy organizations:

The United States is not alone in attempting to de-citizen its international adoptees. Recently the Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection said that amended Australian birth certificates, issued as part of the adoption process, are no longer lawful evidence of citizenship [37] leaving the citizenship of thousands of internationally adopted Australians in limbo and at best forced to apply for the citizenship they believe they already hold.

Selected Resources

Contacting Congress Directory [36]

S2275 [32]

HB5454 [33]

Adoptee Rights Campaign [34]

Gazillion Strong [38]

Land of Gazillion Adoptees [39]

Korean American Association [40]

Pound Pup Legacy Deportation Cases [41]

National Korean American Service & Education Consortium [42]

Written by Marley Greiner with assistance from Shea Grimm

Published July 1, 2016

©2016. Bastard Nation: The Adoptee Rights Organization
www.bastards.org

 

[43] [44] [45]Share This! [46]