Comments on: Ohio Breaking News: House Passes HB61 http://bastards.org/ohio-breaking-news-house-passes-hb61/ The Adoptee Rights Organization Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:42:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: maddogmarley http://bastards.org/ohio-breaking-news-house-passes-hb61/#comment-736 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:42:24 +0000 http://www.bastards.org/?p=4445#comment-736 In reply to Dan Washington.

Dan – I agree with you all the way. Due to time constraints I haven’t written much about Ohio (and I’m here), but I do believe the DVI can be gotten around. There appears to be interest in the legislature, but I don’t know how much. It has been clear from the beginning that the legislature at this the doesn’t want to deal with voiding DVs, thanks to Leg Services. Once that DV got its toe in the door in 1996, it became impossible for Ohio, under the current circumstances to become a free state. We’ve got a legal agreement between the state and anonymous individuals. It’s a crime. (Each closed state is a crime, but states like Ohio, particularly so.) I agree with you that within the next few years, where a handful of unlucky bastards are denied access and everybody else isn’t, is going to make the state a laughing stock. Same for Washington State which strangely has had a DV on the books since the 1990s, but was only asserted for the first time last year–4 times. Gee, what can that be about. (snark!) Unfortunately many deformers feel that something is better than nothing and continue to pimp compromised bill as “something.” We can always go back later and pick up the left behinds, which so far, has never happened. All I can say is that there’s a lot of naivete and denial out there.

]]>
By: Dan Washington http://bastards.org/ohio-breaking-news-house-passes-hb61/#comment-725 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:45:10 +0000 http://www.bastards.org/?p=4445#comment-725 The truth is that Ohio Legislative Services, which vets all bills, refused to OK challenging the DV law that amounts to an agreement between the State of Ohio and a handful of cowardly biological parents who demand that the government grant them a special privilege to hide their identities from their adult offspring. This “agreement” is quite different from the blanket sealing of OBCs with no legal ”agreement,” despite what opponents claim and we have shown repeatedly holds no water. No one knows how many shirkers are on file here, but the number 20 has been tossed around the last couple of years. I believe DVs can be removed from 1996 law, but the legal arguments need to be developed more fully, and the big fat arm of Legislative Services needs twisted. I also believe that the foolishness of OBC access for all but a minuscule number of bastards will within the next few years be recognized. for the absurdity it is. There is time to save those few kids who have been black-holed since they won’t even be eligible for access for another couple years. Perhaps I am too hopeful.

]]>