Home » Currently Reading:

Testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on S.682

October 5, 1999

Foreign Relations Committee
The Honorable Senator Jesse Helms, Chairman
United States Senate
450 Senate Dirksen Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510

Re: S.682 – Intercountry Adoption Convention Implementation Act of 1999, 106th Congress

Mr. Chairman & Committee Members:

Thank you for providing us with this opportunity to express our concerns regarding S.682 – Intercountry Adoption Convention Implementation Act of 1999 (“S.682” or the “Bill”). Bastard Nation is an incorporated not-for-profit organization dedicated to preserving and restoring the rights of adoptees.

  1. Executive Summary and Recommendation
    1. Introduction

      We have the following areas of concern with S.682:

      1. Title IV, Section 401 of S.682.

        We are concerned that S.682 Section 401 will impose by law a form of secrecy on the adoption process which is, by its nature, unfair and discriminatory toward Americans adopted from foreign countries. We believe that the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption (the “Hague Convention”) should be enabled by the United States in a manner such that the rights of intercountry adult adoptees to know their identities will be protected and affirmed.

      2. The hearing process for S.682.

        We are concerned that no apparent effort was made to invite American citizens personally affected by international adoption, including adoptees, adoptive parents and birthparents and the voluntary organizations representing them, to submit testimony to the Committee regarding S.682, despite the fact that the Bill may have a direct impact upon their lives and the lives of all Americans touched by adoption.

    2. Recommendation

      We urge the Committee to amend Section 401 of S. 682 to protect the right of adult intercountry adoptees to freely access any Hague Convention-related information held on them by American government agencies where such access would not explicitly contravene the Hague Convention. Failing amendment of Section 401, we request the Committee to reject S.682 in its entirety. We also request that in the future the Committee makes appropriate efforts to provide timely notification of relevant hearings and pending legislation to American citizens personally concerned with the international adoption process so that they may participate more meaningfully in the legislative process.

  2. Concerns with S.682 (Title IV, Section 401)

    Adult adoptees everywhere deserve the information held on them by public agencies and courts concerning their identities, heritage and development. We are concerned that secrecy provisions far more stringent than those required under Article 30 of the Hague Convention are included in S.682. We believe that American intercountry adoptees have an interest in seeing their access to such information legally preserved instead of prohibited, and we also believe that this interest takes precedence over whatever foreign interests S.682 seeks to protect by prohibiting such access. It is our view that the Federal government should not be maintaining secret files on American citizens in the absence of a national interest for doing so, nor should the Federal government require state and local administrations to do likewise through Federal legislation. However, Section 401 ( b ) seems to have the effect of legally requiring the maintenance of such secret files, and of permanently preventing adoptees from accessing them. Our system of government requires that all citizens deserve to be accorded equal dignity and respect under the law. Specifically restricting the legal ability of adult intercountry adoptees to access their personal files and exempting them from the Freedom of Information Act of 1966, as amended, violates the dignity of such adults, and is discriminatory. Section 401 ( c ) provides for such an exemption, which we understand is normally made only where interests of national security or public safety are involved. There are no interests of national security or public safety involved in providing non-criminal and non-suspect American citizens with access to their own records, even where such records come into the possession of our government from foreign sources through the Hague Convention adoption process. In addition, Section 401 appears to go against the will of the American people in respect of the treatment of the government-held records of adoptees. State legislatures have enacted or are considering the enactment of laws to allow domestically adopted adults access to certain adoption records. Oregon and Tennessee have recently enacted legislation permitting access to identifying information. On Friday, September 27, 1999, the Tennessee State Supreme Court ruled that such legislation is permitted under their state constitution, dismissing attempts by plaintiffs to overturn the state law in question (Doe v. Sundquist). This follows a ruling by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court on 2/11/97 upholding the same law, as well as by the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court on 10/6/97 to grant certiorari to those opposed to the law in their petition to stop it from going into effect. On July 16, 1999, a lower court in Oregon issued a similar ruling (Doe v. Kitzhaber) relating to that state’s new law permitting adult adoptees to access their Original Birth Certificates – a law which was approved by [57%] of Oregon voters in a state initiative in November, 1998. Furthermore, recent public opinion surveys conducted by organizations such as CNN have shown that a vast majority of Americans support the ending of adoption secrecy laws. S.682 threatens to make these gains meaningless for intercountry adoptees. It is unclear why the sponsors of this legislation, Senators Jesse Helms and Mary Landrieu, appear to be going against the national trend toward greater openness.

    America’s states are not the only governments which give recognition to the rights denied by S.682. Many foreign countries also provide adoptees with access to government-held records, including countries who regularly allow children to be adopted in the United States. Yet S.682 seeks to perpetually seal the records of adoptees who enter the U.S. from all countries, regardless of the adoption practices prevalent in those countries – an extreme form of adoption secrecy which is not required under the Hague Convention or any other international instrument. If S.682 is passed as written, adoptees coming from certain countries would legally lose their right to information about their identities and heritage only when they become Americans under the provisions of S.682. Such secrecy requirements may also conceivably prevent such adoptees from benefiting under foreign programs created to assist adoptees once they become adults. Foreign governments have or are considering measures which would provide international adoptees with certain benefits. However, the ability of future generations of intercountry adoptees to take advantage of such benefits may be put in jeopardy by S.682’s secrecy provisions. A case in point is the Republic of Korea, which, according to statistics provided by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service was the source of 1,829 intercountry adoptees entering the United States in 1998. South Korea provides considerable assistance to adoptees seeking to obtain information about their identities, as well as programs which provide tangible economic and social benefits to such adoptees, should they choose to return to South Korea.

    The right of adoptees to information to their identities and heritage is widely recognized and mandated in a number of international instruments. These instruments include the Hague Convention (Article 30), the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (Articles 7, 8 and 20 (3) ), the U.N. Declaration on Legal and Social Principles Relating to the Protection and Welfare of Children, with Special Reference to Foster Placement and Adoption Nationally and Internationally (Articles 9 and 24) and the widely accepted Uniform Guidelines for Foster Care and Adoption prepared by the International Council on Social Welfare (Sections 2.11 and 4.10). Section 401 of S.682 appears to go against both the intent and letter of these instruments, including the instrument it purports to enable.

  3. Concerns about the Legislative Process in Respect of S.682

    We are disappointed that no credible attempt was made to solicit testimony from individuals and voluntary organizations representing any of the parties personally involved in the adoption process. We have heard reports to this effect from voluntary groups representing birth-parents and adoptive parents who have expressed similar concerns. Americans who have experienced international adoption first hand as adoptees, adoptive parents or birthparents are in a position to provide meaningful and substantive feedback to the Committee. We ask the Committee to see these people and their organizations as the valuable resources they are and to solicit testimony from them. We also believe that the involvement of such people in the legislative process offers a necessary complement to the views of adoption professionals and others, including paid lobbyists, involved with the adoption process in remunerated capacities, who may have certain vested interests with respect to the outcomes of such process.

  4. Conclusion

    We believe the purposes of the Hague Convention are to mandate accountability and integrity in the international adoption process, and to provide minimal standards for protecting the rights of adoptees, including the right of adoptees to information with respect to their identities and heritage. S.682 as drafted appears to contradict these purposes, and thus requires amendment or rejection by the Committee in the manner set forth in this testimony. We request that the honorable members of the Committee recognize that international adoption is a lifelong process and not merely about “moving” children and babies across international borders. The American enabling legislation for the Hague Convention needs to reflect such a lifelong process, as well as to better protect the interests of those who become American citizens through application of its provisions. The best means to achieve these ends are to ensure that the legislation in question is consistent with the desires of the American people, and, in particular, those voters who are personally concerned with the adoption process. We stand prepared to assist you in this process.

Yours sincerely,

Ron Morgan
Executive Committee,
Bastard Nation
San Francisco, California

Julie Dennis
Legislative Committee,
Bastard Nation
Seattle, Washington

Albert S. Wei
Educational Development Committee,
Bastard Nation
La Jolla, California and London, England

Follow Bastard Nation

new! Bastard Nation Analysis and Endorsement of the Adoptee Citizenship Act 2015

new!  Bastard Nation Analysis and Endorsement of the Adoptee Citizenship Act 2015

Stop deporting our brothers and sisters!

Bastard Nation Executive Committee and LegCom page

Bastard Nation Executive Committee and LegCom page

Read about Bastard Nation leadership

THE BASTARD BOUTIQUE IS NOW OPEN! STOCK UP ON BASTARD SWAG FOR YOURSELF, YOUR FRIENDS. GIVE THE GIFT OF BASTARDY TO ANYONE, ANY TIME, ANY WHERE.

THE BASTARD BOUTIQUE IS NOW OPEN!  STOCK UP ON BASTARD SWAG FOR YOURSELF, YOUR FRIENDS. GIVE THE GIFT OF BASTARDY TO ANYONE, ANY TIME, ANY WHERE.

Your one-stop shopping for everything Bastard is now live. You can get our latest Bastard Nation swag at the Bastard Boutique. Quantities are limited! -- CLICK THE PIC!

FACEBOOK OFFICIAL BN PAGE

FACEBOOK OFFICIAL BN PAGE

Join us on the Official Bastard Nation Facebook page. The only "adoption" page on Facebook dedicated to discussion and promotion of adoptee autonomy, civil rights, bastard theory, political organizing, and activism. You can also sign up there for our BN mail list which includes all of our Action Alerts. This is not a search and support page. No Woundies need apply! (Page live on July 1, 2015)

FACEBOOK SOCIAL BN PAGE

FACEBOOK SOCIAL BN PAGE

Join the Bastard Nation Public Page, a public service for Bastard Nationals, friends and supporters. General discussion on adoptee rights and related issues.

TWITTER

TWITTER

Join us on Twitter. All the Bastardly news fit to tweet!

PINTEREST

PINTEREST

Join us on Pinterest. Bastard icons, images, members, actions, politics, and fun. And Christopher Walken!

Become a Bastard Nation Legislative Liaison!

Become a Bastard Nation Legislative Liaison!

Bastard Nation needs Legislative Liaisons in every state with laws that seal adoption records. We need eyes and ears in the legislatures, creating relationships and gathering information.

What does a BN Legislative Liaison do? They talk with lawmakers and their staff about adoptee rights and the laws that seal records. They distribute Bastard Nation position papers and FAQs to legislators and staff members. They record their conversations and report to the BN Legislative Committee.

They are organized, informed, friendly, helpful, and engaged.

What do you need to do to be a BN Legislative Liaison?

1. You need to live close to the capitol of your state.
2. You need to be able to appear friendly, even when talking with people who disagree with you or are just disagreeable, period.
3. You need to have a flexible schedule.
4. You need to agree with Bastard Nation’s mission: If you don’t know what that is, go to bastardnation.org, it’s right there on our welcome page.

Those are the prerequisites. If you are interested, click the picture of the capitol rotunda, and fill out the application form. We will be in touch and schedule an online orientation and training.

We look forward to working with you!

Read what real live adoptees have to say about secret adoption and sealed records....A service of Bastard Nation and Emma Pea! Fighting adoptacrats since 1996.

Hit the pic for archives.

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: Meet Sharley!

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:  Meet Sharley!

Bastard Nation Moms Club

Bastard Nation Moms Club

Bastard Nation is gathering the names of moms who are willing to step forward and say that they were never promised confidentiality. If you are willing to participate, please comment this status. Your name (and if you choose, the relinquishment date) will be added to a list used in newspaper ads and to educate legislators.

Bastard Nation Action Alerts (from old BN page)

Bastardly Books by Bastards and Friends

-

  Photobucket

Click Here To Enter

-

 

Recent Comments

bastard-chronicles

bastard-chronicles

Help us celebrate 20 years of bastardy! Bastard Nation is proud to announce the publication of "The Bastard Chronicles: 20 Years of Adoptee Equality Activism in the U.S.and the Birth of a Bastard Nation", Compiled and edited by Marla Paul, "The Bastard Chronicles" is primer for adoptee equality. It features a diverse collection of Bastard theory, and practice, Bastard and Bastard Nation history, legislative and political action, personal stories, art, and literature. It is the public face of Class Bastard written by Bastard Nationals and those we have influenced. Get yours in time for the holidays. Available at Amazon in print and Kindle today. (After the first of the year the print edition will also be available through the Bastard Boutique.

Join Bastard Nation!

Join Bastard Nation!

This summer we are updating our membership/donation page and payment process. If you would like to join or donate, please hit the spemrie. It will take you to our Bastard Boutique page. Follow instructions from there. Be sure to include a quick note with your contact information and anything else you'd like us us know..

My, my it’s American Bastard Pie! (design by Lisa Zatonsky)

My, my it’s American  Bastard Pie! (design by Lisa Zatonsky)

See our state partners:

See our state partners:

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: CalOpen

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: CalOpen

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Indiana Open Access

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Indiana Open Access

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Michigan Open Access

Proud Bastard Nation Partner:  Michigan Open Access

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Missouri Open

Proud Bastard Nation Partner:  Missouri Open

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Equal Access Oklahoma

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Equal Access Oklahoma

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Open Adoption Records in Quebec

Proud Bastard Nation Partner: Open Adoption Records in Quebec

SAMPLE STATE ORGANIZATION RESOLUTION AGAINST VETOES AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS

SAMPLE STATE ORGANIZATION RESOLUTION AGAINST VETOES AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS

Any political organization seeking to enact true open records legislation should be very clear with both their constituents and the legislators they work with about what the essential provisions of the proposed bill are. Any modification or deletion of the essential provisions of a bill should be immediate cause to have the bill killed.

Any political organization seeking the assistance of Bastard Nation to pass open records legislation must hold unconditional access by adult adoptees to the original record of their birth as an essential provision that cannot be modified or deleted. Read our Mission Statement.

Bastard Nation will not assist any political organization to pass open records legislation unless their governing board or other leadership

passes a written resolution such as the following that commits the board to a strategy of no compromise on key provisions
informs its constituents of this commitment and this strategy
informs the sponsoring legislators of this commitment and this strategy.

WHEREAS we recognize that disclosure and contact vetoes, redactions, mandatory intermediaries and registry provisions are an affront to the dignity of adopted persons everywhere and a violation of their right to due process and equal treatment under the law,

WHEREAS there has been a demonstrable negative effect on the ability to pass unconditional open records in states that have passed veto legislation and/or any provisions that are less than unconditional access on demand by the adult adoptee,

WHEREAS our primary goal is to restore the right of adult adoptees everywhere to be treated as full citizens under the law,

WE HEREBY DECLARE that under no circumstances will we accept the addition of veto, redaction, intermediary, or registry provisions, or any conditional provisions to our legislation that would be less than unconditional access for adult adoptees to the original record of their birth. All legislative sponsors and members of this organization will be informed of our policy on this matter to ensure that the bill is pulled promptly in the event of such revisions.